Not sure why I just had to figure it out, but that works out to 1,647,527 (decimal)...bound_jenny wrote:110010010001110100111?
Jenny.
Computer Bondage
as to the safety of a computer i think both sides can be argued.
I'm a pc programmer by trade, and the handful of machines i have running at home haven't crashed in a long time.
Any method of release can fail, which is why its always best to have more than one as people have said here.
But i would happily consider a pc release method, just haven't found a need for one yet
I'm a pc programmer by trade, and the handful of machines i have running at home haven't crashed in a long time.
Any method of release can fail, which is why its always best to have more than one as people have said here.
But i would happily consider a pc release method, just haven't found a need for one yet
- curious_sb
- Retired Moderator
- Posts: 1147
- Joined: 24 Mar 2006, 00:38
- Location: United Kingdom
Michelle wrote:Not sure why I just had to figure it out, but that works out to 1,647,527 (decimal)...bound_jenny wrote:110010010001110100111?
Jenny.
I make it 1,647,527 too - anyway the joke was there aren't ten people, it was two - in binary, nobody laughed, shows how geeky the joke was lol
Curious_SB
Retired Forum Moderator
Retired Forum Moderator
I chuckled the first time i heard it, back in uni
curious_sb wrote:Michelle wrote:Not sure why I just had to figure it out, but that works out to 1,647,527 (decimal)...bound_jenny wrote:110010010001110100111?
Jenny.
I make it 1,647,527 too - anyway the joke was there aren't ten people, it was two - in binary, nobody laughed, shows how geeky the joke was lol
-
- *
- Posts: 49
- Joined: 07 Nov 2007, 22:45
- Location: England
curious_sb wrote:Michelle wrote:Not sure why I just had to figure it out, but that works out to 1,647,527 (decimal)...bound_jenny wrote:110010010001110100111?
Jenny.
I make it 1,647,527 too - anyway the joke was there aren't ten people, it was two - in binary, nobody laughed, shows how geeky the joke was lol
its not the fact that its geeky, just that the joke was invented the same day binary was
- bound_jenny
- Moderator
- Posts: 10268
- Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 12:37
- Location: Montreal, Canada, Great Kinky North
- curious_sb
- Retired Moderator
- Posts: 1147
- Joined: 24 Mar 2006, 00:38
- Location: United Kingdom
-
- ****
- Posts: 579
- Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 09:03
Hmmm, electronic, USB programmable combo locks? Write some program that randomizes the combination every time, sends it to the lock, and then divulges it 2 days later?kate wrote:no, but i wouldn't trust any solo release unless it was something fun...Combination locks on dresses and heels for example
- Dark_Lizerd
- *****
- Posts: 2418
- Joined: 22 Oct 2006, 11:30
- Location: New Mexico
I'm bad with spelling, but...
could someone correct the thread name??? Please!!!
But I do have an idea that may make the PC safer as a release device...
Have the paralel (OK! DB25 port!) output a clock signal, and have the device release when the clock is lost. IE
(basic)
out port #1, h001
out port #1, h255
loop...
if the PC crashes, to program stops and the clock signal goes away and the locking device opens....
could someone correct the thread name??? Please!!!
But I do have an idea that may make the PC safer as a release device...
Have the paralel (OK! DB25 port!) output a clock signal, and have the device release when the clock is lost. IE
(basic)
out port #1, h001
out port #1, h255
loop...
if the PC crashes, to program stops and the clock signal goes away and the locking device opens....
All advice is checked, re-checked and verified to be questionable...
Don't ask, we both wont understand the answer...
http://www.mediafire.com/download/09dtr ... e_V2_2.exe Not just for nubies any more...
Don't ask, we both wont understand the answer...
http://www.mediafire.com/download/09dtr ... e_V2_2.exe Not just for nubies any more...
- curious_sb
- Retired Moderator
- Posts: 1147
- Joined: 24 Mar 2006, 00:38
- Location: United Kingdom