Chastity inserts for woman
Posted: 28 Mar 2018, 17:21
When it comes to chastity, you know that you have belts. The belts are for both men and woman, which are complete metal style underpants that enclose around the waist and will be impossible to be removed.
In addition, males also have chastity cages, which are small enclosures for the penis that can be locked.
Because these are much smaller than belts, they often are so much more cheaper too.
That made me wonder, why isn't there such thing for woman?
True, woman don't have anchor points that a cage could go around, but woman, unlike men do have a hole that stuff can be inserted into. (Please understand, I'm not trying to disgrace woman here. I'd love to have a pussy, although I would not want to lose my penis either.)
So that made me wonder... If I were to design a chastity device for woman that would not need a belt, I would do it as follows:
I would use a specially made dildo, which from this moment on, I'll refer to as the pole. The pole would not have to be very long. Probably 10 cm is plenty.
The pole would not be too big in diameter either, although there would likely be various sizes because some holes are wider than others due to stretching and stuff.
From the pole, blunt hooks would point outwards in a 45 degree which are rounded, all pointing downwards. At the end, they are not sharp, though they are not too dull either.
The idea is that you push the pole with many of these hooks inside, and they anchor inside you. You can pull it further inside, but not pull out, as all the anchor points would then dig into the flesh inside. Little force should not cause pain, but if the force is exceeded it should cause pain and possible injury.
The idea is that after each anchor point, there is another anchor point in reverse that can moved inwards and outwards by turning a key around in the shaft of the pole. You would not need a key to lock it in place, but only to remove it. By turning the key many times around, and pushing the other anchors outwards, they'll move against the flesh in the opposite direction, making sure that the flesh no longer touches the fixed anchor points. At this point, the pole can be safely pushed out, although it cannot be pushed inwards for the same reason as that you can't put it outwards when in locked state.
Add a shield to the front that covers the labia and clitoris and it should work well enough. Though it is possible one could still reach underneath or rotate it, but both would be very uncomfortable, and well... chastity cages can also be cheated on, and usually are used just to play the game. This would essentially be the same kind of device.
Now, again, I don't have a pussy, and every pussy is different, but I genuinely think this could work.
I've attached a rough sketch of what the device would be. The blue lines is a hinge mechanism operated by a key. You turn the key, then you are able to push it inwards, which pulls all the blue lines outwards, turn it again to lock it in that position, and you can then safely extract the device. Turn the key, pull it back outwards which retracts the pins, and the device is in locked position.
And yes, the image only shows 4 pins, but its hard to draw like 40. The device would need more in order to prevent that the weight of the device which pulls down, would cause discomfort. More pins means the weight is distributed through each pin which effectively makes each pin able to cause less discomfort the more there are. The 4 pins could also be substituted by round disks, but that may give so much comfort that the device could be pulled out without any pain.
What do you think? Any comments?
In addition, males also have chastity cages, which are small enclosures for the penis that can be locked.
Because these are much smaller than belts, they often are so much more cheaper too.
That made me wonder, why isn't there such thing for woman?
True, woman don't have anchor points that a cage could go around, but woman, unlike men do have a hole that stuff can be inserted into. (Please understand, I'm not trying to disgrace woman here. I'd love to have a pussy, although I would not want to lose my penis either.)
So that made me wonder... If I were to design a chastity device for woman that would not need a belt, I would do it as follows:
I would use a specially made dildo, which from this moment on, I'll refer to as the pole. The pole would not have to be very long. Probably 10 cm is plenty.
The pole would not be too big in diameter either, although there would likely be various sizes because some holes are wider than others due to stretching and stuff.
From the pole, blunt hooks would point outwards in a 45 degree which are rounded, all pointing downwards. At the end, they are not sharp, though they are not too dull either.
The idea is that you push the pole with many of these hooks inside, and they anchor inside you. You can pull it further inside, but not pull out, as all the anchor points would then dig into the flesh inside. Little force should not cause pain, but if the force is exceeded it should cause pain and possible injury.
The idea is that after each anchor point, there is another anchor point in reverse that can moved inwards and outwards by turning a key around in the shaft of the pole. You would not need a key to lock it in place, but only to remove it. By turning the key many times around, and pushing the other anchors outwards, they'll move against the flesh in the opposite direction, making sure that the flesh no longer touches the fixed anchor points. At this point, the pole can be safely pushed out, although it cannot be pushed inwards for the same reason as that you can't put it outwards when in locked state.
Add a shield to the front that covers the labia and clitoris and it should work well enough. Though it is possible one could still reach underneath or rotate it, but both would be very uncomfortable, and well... chastity cages can also be cheated on, and usually are used just to play the game. This would essentially be the same kind of device.
Now, again, I don't have a pussy, and every pussy is different, but I genuinely think this could work.
I've attached a rough sketch of what the device would be. The blue lines is a hinge mechanism operated by a key. You turn the key, then you are able to push it inwards, which pulls all the blue lines outwards, turn it again to lock it in that position, and you can then safely extract the device. Turn the key, pull it back outwards which retracts the pins, and the device is in locked position.
And yes, the image only shows 4 pins, but its hard to draw like 40. The device would need more in order to prevent that the weight of the device which pulls down, would cause discomfort. More pins means the weight is distributed through each pin which effectively makes each pin able to cause less discomfort the more there are. The 4 pins could also be substituted by round disks, but that may give so much comfort that the device could be pulled out without any pain.
What do you think? Any comments?