bound_jenny wrote:kinbaku wrote:I once bought fabric belts in advertising that closed like this:
Belt_D_rings.jpg
They have the advantage that you can use them for any size (wrists, ankles, arms, legs, ...) and if you are handy, you can make them yourself using 2 D-rings.

That's the basic concept of the "ring device":
https://www.boundanna.com/html/en_tech_ringdevice.htmlCool!
Jenny.
It is, yes. It probably even works a bit better than the rope based ring device, because the belt has more surface area that will be pinched between the rings.
The rings, by the way, can be made of two separate chain links as well. These are substantially cheaper than D-rings, or at least that's my experience. Again, they can probably withstand larger force, but on the other hand will probably let the belt slip a bit easier, due to their larger wire diameter compared to the D-rings.
If you use that kind of closing mechanism please be aware that there's nothing that prevents it from overtightening! Thus make sure that there's nothing pulling on the lose end of the belt once the belt-loop is closed.
Also, it can be fairly problematic to open it, if there's too much tension on the belt, as that tension is what keeps the rings pulled together, thereby pinching the belt.
As long as all of that's taken into consideration, that kind of belt is a fairly nice option for everyday items that can well be used for our purposes whilst still being absolutely hidden in plain sight. It's a belt, after all!

If the doors of perception were cleansed everything would appear to man as it is, infinite. (W. Blake)