how to set free

[speedy-j]

I am not new to bondage. But I would say I am newbi on the fact that I have always cheated. I would often bond my legs with rope or duck tape, however my hands were different. I would use toy hand cuffs or tie my hands together so that the ropes feels tight yet my hand can slip out easy. I want to take it to the next level and truly tie my hands up. In that case how do you set yourself free?

[qwerty212]

Visit the main site, on the basics section. There you'll find a lot of release methods.
http://www.boundanna.com/html/en_basics.html
Maybe the most reliable is the ice melting.


If you can't afford on real handcuffs (or just can't hide them at home) there are a lot of possibilities to really tie yourself. Just with zipties and padlock you can make a homemade handcuffs.


If you have a laptop then you can use some software to play selfbondage.

So you can put the key for the padlock on ahigh shell and you'll be tied until the computer opens the cd tray.


(clicking on the image takes you to the post of the program)

There are more programs that can be used in selfbondage (some using combination padlocks) so I think that it would be great if you visit the software subforum:
http://forum.boundanna.net/board/viewforum.php?f=28

Anyway, whatever is the method that you use to get free remeber that it can fail, so you always MUST use a secondary release method (and even more than two, if you can).

Greets from Barcelona

[speedy-j]

how does release them self when hog tied with rope?

[bound_jenny]

how does release them self when hog tied with rope?

You do like me - in the reverse order of how you got in.

Jenny.

[lj]

how does release them self when hog tied with rope?

with difficulty!

If you have made a good job of the tie, and it is tight , then safety scissors within reach are about your best option, or use an ice-release between hands and feet so you regain some freedom of movement.

[onestrangeguy]

There's a lot of hype on this and other sites about needing to be securely bound. While there's nothing wrong with that concept, actually I find that being bound is almost more a state of mind than a physical process. Yes, the physical bonds need to be there, but as you have found, your self-release or insecure handcuffs probably did the job rather nicely in that they gave you the feeling of being bound while still providing an avenue of release when it was needed.

That is taking the long way around to say that you don't always need an inescapable bond to make you feel as though you're stuck. There's nothing wrong with toy handcuffs if you can realistically pretend that they're real.

[qwerty212]

There's a lot of hype on this and other sites about needing to be securely bound. While there's nothing wrong with that concept, actually I find that being bound is almost more a state of mind than a physical process. Yes, the physical bonds need to be there, but as you have found, your self-release or insecure handcuffs probably did the job rather nicely in that they gave you the feeling of being bound while still providing an avenue of release when it was needed.

That is taking the long way around to say that you don't always need an inescapable bond to make you feel as though you're stuck. There's nothing wrong with toy handcuffs if you can realistically pretend that they're real.

I'm totally agre with you.

[lj]

There's a lot of hype on this and other sites about needing to be securely bound.

a matter of opinion, and I 'd politely disagree with the term "hype"

For many, the whole point is that the bondage will remain secure until the release occurs. I know from discussions elsewhere that there is pretty much an even distribution between those who like the bondage to be secure, and those who don't. That comes from a general BDSM site (InformedConsent.co.uk) rather than one like boundanna.com which specialises in self-bondage, and generally solo activities. It would be interesting to run a poll on this?

I'm certainly in the "secure" group, fortunately for me, My Lady has got the hang of padlocks and chain

[bound_jenny]

For me, "inescapability" is beside the point. Experience has taught me that I want to feel the bondage first and foremost, to be as immobilized as possible in a SB context, to feel the ropes on my body, to struggle against my bonds and sense the futility in trying to move. For me, it's the sensation more than the notion.

I can get out of it when I want - my wrist coil is just loose enough for me to wiggle my hands through with difficulty - I have to work at it, but I can get out. There still is an emergency release of scissors or a knife, but I try to avoid that. It's a question self-discipline as to when I choose to release myself. I set myself a time, and I try to go through with it. If I feel wrong along the way, I can get out.

Now if I want to be completely helpless, unable to escape, then I ask someone to tie me up. Then I want the works - elbows tied, arms held tightly against my back, a gag that keeps me effectively quiet, the whole enchilada. As much rope as possible. The less I am able to move, the more turned on I get. A little vibration in the right spot, a little pain here and there, and blastoff!

Oh, it's way too much fun to be a perv.

Jenny.

[RADER]

bound_jenny
I wish I could put you in a create I once made; I think you would enjoy it.
The only thing you could move is a slight wiggle of your nose.
Rader

[sogagged]

I totally agree with Jenny!! +1

When I didn't felt well-tied, tight, is like a 50% SB