www.BoundAnna.com

I don't think a ban on men in power would be useful. Bans usually don't amount to much and when you ban something, people will just want it even more.

I'd say we get some smart and sexy women dressed in corsets, stockings, and stiletto heels, get the whip industry humming, and see who's in power then...

We would whip this world into shape for sure.

Jenny.

bound_jenny wrote: I'd say we get some smart and sexy women dressed in corsets, stockings, and stiletto heels, get the whip industry humming, and see who's in power then...
Jenny.

Political debates would really be something to watch then!
.

bounddosster wrote:I have always considered the world would be a much better place if ruin by a large majority of women or just solely by women, maybe with a complete ban on men holding any office of power.

What a well-figtting mistake

MKu wrote:What a well-figtting mistake

I see you were nervous when typing that one...

Good call.

Jenny.

bound_jenny wrote: I see you were nervous when typing that one...

I have a mistress too

MKu wrote:

bound_jenny wrote: I see you were nervous when typing that one...

I have a mistress too

Oh, good! Then there is someone to deal out an appropriate punishment!

Jenny.

MKu wrote:

bounddosster wrote:I have always considered the world would be a much better place if ruin by a large majority of women or just solely by women, maybe with a complete ban on men holding any office of power.

What a well-figtting mistake

Well men have done their best to put the world in ruin so why shouldn't women have a go at ruining in as well.

bound_jenny wrote:I don't think a ban on men in power would be useful. Bans usually don't amount to much and when you ban something, people will just want it even more.

I'd say we get some smart and sexy women dressed in corsets, stockings, and stiletto heels, get the whip industry humming, and see who's in power then...

We would whip this world into shape for sure.

Jenny.

I think that can be saved for when the women return home and inspect their man's daily activity.

I was serious about men being banned from power. I really believe women would do a much better job. Even though some powerful positions have been held by women the majority of power has still been in the hands of men and they have pressured women into toeing the line or be forced out.

It is said that a woman is a success if she makes it in a man's world. Why? because she is presumed to be inferior and weak because she is female and she is a success because she has over come that and now is macho or as power stupid as men.

If only women ruled the world they would not have to meet a standard set by men and there would be no patronizing patting on the back and saying well done dear your as good as we are, but don't forget your still just a woman.

And one day all women will announce in unison:

"Resistance is futile. You will surrender yourselves immediately. From this point forward, you will service us."

The sharp taps of stiletto heels will resound through the halls of power. Toilet seats shall be always down. Underwear shall never again litter the floors of the world.

Don't worry, boys. We'll have jobs for you. As in cleaning my boots; a nimble tongue is an asset.

This has made me feel evil and megalomaniacal. Aren't fantasies wonderful?

Jenny.

Yes I guess it is a fantasy. Women have been to well trodden and brainwashed into submission by powerful men to raise up and take control of the world. If British women had had this modern attitude a hundred years ago they would never had won the right to vote in Britain.

It is indeed a sad time we live in.

The trouble with women now days is they have no balls.

bounddosster wrote:The trouble with women now days is they have no balls.

Your narrative so far indicates that the balls are the source of the trouble.

With this mess I'm glad I don't have any. But I do have boobs!

Jenny.

bound_jenny wrote:

bounddosster wrote:Your narrative so far indicates that the balls are the source of the trouble.

Not so much the balls but the men attached to them and before you say it I'm not suggesting removing the balls just the men.

bound_jenny wrote:With this mess I'm glad I don't have any. But I do have boobs!

Yes and I'm sure they are very nice.

What is needed is more boobs in power and less balls, After all a slight boob is better than a complete balls up.

Lets have people with some real tits at the top instead of just tits.

I'm starting a new movement to help get more boobs in power, We are call BRAS and will support all Boobs.
Come the reveloution we will all be in bras.

bound_jenny if you know of any boobs that need supporting then I can lend a hand or if it's a big job both hands. I favour neither the left or the right and will give equal support to both.

bounddosster wrote:I'm not suggesting removing the balls just the men.

That will leave a lot of loose balls lying around.

bounddosster wrote:I can lend a hand or if it's a big job both hands. I favour neither the left or the right and will give equal support to both.

Nice to know you're non-partisan...

Jenny.

bound_jenny wrote:

bounddosster wrote:I'm not suggesting removing the balls just the men.

That will leave a lot of loose balls lying around.

Oh yes, ha,ha. Some people take things so literal.
I meant they could keep their balls attached, just get rid of the whole package. No, don't even go there Jenny.

bounddosster wrote:just get rid of the whole package

At least they won't be loose. And there's a handle to pick them up. Much tidier.

bounddosster wrote:No, don't even go there Jenny.

I just did.

Jenny.